Similarly, Moirs reductio ad absurdum critique of Australian immigration policy in his cartoon Australian Values Test challenges the exclusivism entrenched in facile notions of Australian identity.
In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for" reduction to absurdity" ; also argumentum ad absurdum, " argument to absurdity" ) is a form of argument that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion, or to prove one by showing that if it were not true, the result would be Difference Between Reductio ad Absurdum and Appeal to Ridicule. Reductio ad absurdum examples cannot be used as an appeal to ridicule.
Though both devices are extensively used in satire, an appeal to ridicule is the use of ridiculing a situation without arguing or explanation; while, reductio ad absurdum pursues arguments and logical In argumentation, reductio ad absurdum is a method of refuting a claim by extending the logic of the opponent's argument to a point of absurdity. Reductio ad absurdum. Here's a proof of the irrationality of the square root of two.
It uses a reductio ad absurdum argument, a" reduction to absurdity" we assume the truth of a statement, see the logical and mathematical consequences of that assumption, then use it to show that it contradicts itself, and thus cannot be true. Similarly, Moirs reductio ad absurdum critique of Australian immigration policy in his cartoon Australian Values Test challenges the exclusivism entrenched in facile notions of Australian identity. Reductio Ad Absurdum is disproving an argument by showing the absurdity of following it through to a logical conclusion.
Essentially, the argument is reduced to its absurdity. This works only if there is faulty logic in the argument to begin with. Examples of Reductio Ad Absurdum: In a location An example of reductio ad absurdum is. " A Modest Proposal" The Rrape of the Lock Horatian satire Juvenalian satire